Few Miami players are worth fantasy looks. Elijhaa Penny to back up. Jeremy Sprinkle to potentially step up as well. Casey Hayward Jr. Skip to main content Skip to navigation. Sunday's fantasy football inactives watch -- Who's in and who's out? NFL Week 10 fantasy football inactives watch: Who's in and who's out?
Week 10's biggest fantasy football questions: NFL reporters give advice. Pittsburgh Steelers. Sources: OBJ may return punts in Rams debut. Los Angeles Rams. Big Ben out vs. Jacob Eason is inactive. Tashaun Gipson Sr. Skip to main content Skip to navigation.
NFL Week 4 fantasy football inactives watch: Who's in and who's out? NFL Week 10 fantasy football inactives watch: Who's in and who's out? Week 10's biggest fantasy football questions: NFL reporters give advice. Pittsburgh Steelers. Sources: OBJ may return punts in Rams debut. Los Angeles Rams. Big Ben out vs. Seattle Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll wants to see the NFL eliminate the practice of having teams make seven players inactive for games every week.
As the rules currently stand, active rosters in the NFL consist of 53 players that are eligible to play in games. However, 90 minutes before every game the teams must declare seven players inactive for the game. Therefore the list of players that can actually play consists of just 46 players. If for nothing else, to help other guys stay healthy longer. Get more rotation so that guys can stay healthy and contribute. I wish they could. The reasoning behind inactives for games is due to competitive balance.
If one team has all 53 players healthy and their opponent has only 49 players healthy enough to play, the team with fewer healthy players will be at a disadvantage.
With teams having to make seven players inactive, healthy or not, teams will have the same amount of players eligible to play in the game. Carroll said he intends to address the matter with the league formally this offseason along with general manager John Schneider. Positional needs elsewhere led to Seattle needing other players active instead.
Carroll laments having to watch healthy players not be able to contribute. However, this brings salary questions in to play as well. While players inactive on game day still get their weekly salaries, practice squad players make significantly less.
Would they get paid full salary for the weeks they would be bumped into active roster duty? Would it be splitting the difference somehow? On one hand, it makes sense. Teams pay 53 players on their active roster every week.
They should all play. On the other hand. The active roster limit rule should be changed. Owners would like it because there would be more backups to replace injured starters during a game. Sorry Pete. If you want a sidelines full of players, go back to college. Like the idea. If the the NFL can figure out the logistics of putting a team in London they can figure out this. Sadly for the inactive players, it would cost owners money while location in London could make owners money.
0コメント